• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Worldwide network to enhance the science, policy and practice of ecosystem services for conservation and sustainable development

    • Log in
    • Newsletter
    • Contact
  • Community
    • Member Portal
    • ESP membership
      • Individual membership
      • Institutional membership
      • List of members
      • Member organisations
    • Working groups
      • Thematic Working Groups
        • TWG 1 – ES Assessment frameworks & Typologies
        • TWG 2 – Biodiversity & Ecosystem services
        • TWG 3 – ES Indicators
        • TWG 4 – Mapping ES
        • TWG 5 – Modeling ES
        • TWG 6 – Integrated valuation of ES
        • TWG 7 – Economic & Monetary valuation
        • TWG 8 – Cultural services & Values
        • TWG 9 – ES & Public health
        • TWG 10 – ES in Trade-off analysis & Project evaluation
        • TWG 11 – Global ES Flows
        • TWG 12 – ES & Disaster Risk reduction (DRR)
        • TWG 13 – Role of ES in Ecosystem restoration
          • TWG 13A – Biomimetic Solutions
        • TWG 14 – Application of ES in Planning & Management
        • TWG 15 – ES & Poverty alleviation
        • TWG 16 – ES Financing mechanisms (incl. PES)
          • TWG 16A – Tree-based PES (PESFOR-W)
        • TWG 17 – ES Accounting & Greening the economy
        • TWG 18 – Governance & Institutional aspects
        • TWG 19 – Big data & Digital communication
        • TWG 20 – Equity in Ecosystem Services research
      • Biome Working Groups
        • BWG 1 – Marine systems
        • BWG 2 – Freshwater systems
        • BWG 3 – Forests & Woodlands
        • BWG 4 – Drylands
        • BWG 5 – Mediterranean systems
        • BWG 6 – Deserts
        • BWG 7 – Tundras
        • BWG 8 – Polar regions & High mountains
        • BWG 9 – Rural landscapes
        • BWG 10 – Urban systems
      • Sectoral Working Groups
        • SWG 1 – ES in Agricultural production systems
        • SWG 2 – ES in Fishery & Aquaculture
        • SWG 3 – ES in Forestry production systems
        • SWG 4 – ES in Mining, Energy and Transport systems
        • SWG 5 – ES in Water management
        • SWG 6 – ES in Business
        • SWG 7 – ES in (eco) Tourism
        • SWG 8 – ES in Conservation
        • SWG 9 – Indigenous peoples & Local communities
        • SWG 10 – ES in the circular (bio-)economy
    • Regional chapters and National networks
      • North America
        • USA – NESP
        • Canada
      • Central America & Caribbean
        • A. Central America
          • Costa Rica
          • Guatemala
        • B. Caribbean
      • South America
        • Brazil
        • Colombia
        • Sur América – Español
      • West & Central Europe incl. Russia
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • France
        • Germany
        • Italy
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Switzerland
        • The Netherlands
      • South-East Europe
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Greece – HESP
        • North Macedonia
        • Malta
        • Montenegro
        • Romania
        • Serbia – SESP
        • Turkey
      • MENA Middle East & North Africa
        • Israel
        • Jordan
        • Lebanon
      • West & Central Africa
        • Cameroon
        • DRC
        • Liberia
        • Senegal
        • Togo
      • East & Southern Africa
        • Kenya
        • South Africa
        • Zimbabwe
      • West & Central Asia
        • Kazakhstan
      • East Asia
        • China
        • Japan
        • Republic of Korea
      • South & South-East Asia
        • India
        • Indonesia
      • Oceania
        • Australia
        • New Zealand
    • Task Forces
    • Young ES Specialists (YESS)
    • ESP Asia Regional Office
  • Services
    • Networking
    • Journals
    • Case studies & Key sites
    • Data & Knowledge sharing
    • Education & Training
      • ESP Webinar Series
    • Guidelines & Toolkits
    • Relevant newsletters
  • ESP Conferences
    • Regional conferences
    • World Conference 2025
    • Previous conferences
  • Partners
    • Partner organisations
    • Related networks
    • SELINA Project
    • ESMERALDA Project
    • Become a partner
  • Sponsors
    • Become a sponsor
    • Become a member organisation
  • News
    • ESP Update
    • Latest news
    • Events
    • Vacancies
  • About
    • Governance
      • Interim Executive Committee
      • Executive Committee
      • Steering Committee
      • Issue commissions
      • Advisory board
    • Media & ESP
      • Acknowledgements
    • Foundation for Sustainable Development
    • Privacy Policy and Disclaimer

Using a combination of Q-methodology and survey-based approach for assessing forest ecosystem services of Five Finger Mountains in Northern Cyprus

July 17, 2020 by Iskra Categories: News, Publications

This paper attempts to identify and assess the distinct stakeholders’ perspectives regarding Five Finger Mountain Forest Ecosystem Services (MFESs) at the landscape scale in Kyrenia Region of the Northern Cyprus. The objectives of the study were (1) to identify and assess the stakeholders’ perspectives of MFESs and (2) to record the non-wood forest products harvested and associated traditional ecological knowledge. The Q-methodology and focus group discussions were used to collect the qualitative and quantitative data on the objectives of the research. Before the Q-method, 13 focus groups were implemented to record the quantitative data on the ecological knowledge. Afterwards, the Q-method was conducted to identify the perspectives.

The quantitative data collected were analysed by performing the Q-factor analysis. 96 Q-participants sorted 48 Q-statements with 11 categories (from + 5 to − 5). The results revealed that the stakeholders hold four distinct perspectives on the MFESs (recreation, heritage, conservation, and symbolic), which reflect the landscape social values. The results of the focus groups showed that the stakeholders collect 30 wild plant and 5 mushroom species from the forests and still hold the relevant traditional knowledge, which represents the natural resource social values. The landscape and natural resource social values are linked through the value dimension of scale; therefore, both values should be recognized as cultural heritage values and integrated into the forest conservation strategy. The values can also help policy-makers to take better decisions for the conservation and sustainable management of the mountain ecosystems and their services.

 

Ciftcioglu, Gulay Cetinkaya. “Using a combination of Q-methodology and survey-based approach for assessing forest ecosystem services of Five Finger Mountains in Northern Cyprus.” Sustainability Science (2020): 1-17.

Find the full paper here.

Primary Sidebar

Become a member!

Subscribe to newsletter

Already a member? Login below:


Forgot Password

Follow us on:

Footer

Regional Chapters

  • North America
  • Central America & Caribbean
  • South America
  • West & Central Europe incl. Russia
  • South-East Europe
  • MENA Middle East & North Africa
  • West & Central Africa
  • East & Southern Africa
  • West & Central Asia
  • East Asia
  • South & South-East Asia
  • Oceania

Working Groups

  • Thematic Working Groups
  • Biome Working Groups
  • Sectoral Working Groups

Follow us on:

Copyright © 2025 · Foundation for Sustainable Development · Privacy Policy and Disclaimer · Log in · Implemented by Co-Capacity

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkRead more